Chrome 扩展程序:尝试 Network.getResponseBody 时“未找到具有给定标识符的资源”
2017-12-24
144016
我正在编写一个 Chrome 扩展程序,它可以获取某个网站的 HTTP 响应。我尝试使用调试器获取响应主体:
var gCurrentTab;
chrome.debugger.onEvent.addListener(function (source, method, params) {
if (gCurrentTab.id != source.tabId) {
return;
}
if (method == "Network.loadingFinished") {
var tabId = source.tabId;
var requestId = params.requestId;
chrome.debugger.sendCommand(
source,
"Network.getResponseBody",
{"requestId": requestId},
function (body) {
console.log(body);
chrome.debugger.detach(source);
});
}
}
);
chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest.addListener(function (details) {
var url = details.url;
if (url.indexOf('/mypage') >= 0) {
chrome.tabs.query({
currentWindow: true,
active: true
}, function (tabs) {
gCurrentTab = tabs[0];
chrome.debugger.attach({
tabId: gCurrentTab.id
}, "1.0", function () {
chrome.debugger.sendCommand({
tabId: gCurrentTab.id
}, "Network.enable");
});
});
}
},
{urls: []}, ["requestBody", "blocking"]);
但我总是得到
在 chrome-extension://ikphgobkghdkjkfplgokmapjlbdfeegl/background.js:11:29 运行 debugger.sendCommand 时出现 Unchecked Runtime.lastError:{"code":-32000,"message":"未找到具有给定标识符的资源"}
错误,并且主体未定义。
有人知道为什么会发生这种情况吗?谢谢!
3个回答
这是因为网站发送了许多响应,并且此代码将看到我想要的其他请求,然后分离调试器,所以我无法获得结果。
要解决这个问题,只需使用一个调试器并且不要分离它,或者仅在安全时分离。
var gAttached = false;
var gRequests = [];
var gObjects = [];
chrome.debugger.onEvent.addListener(function (source, method, params) {
if (method == "Network.requestWillBeSent") {
// If we see a url need to be handled, push it into index queue
var rUrl = params.request.url;
if (getTarget(rUrl) >= 0) {
gRequests.push(rUrl);
}
}
if (method == "Network.responseReceived") {
// We get its request id here, write it down to object queue
var eUrl = params.response.url;
var target = getTarget(eUrl);
if (target >= 0) {
gObjects.push({
requestId: params.requestId,
target: target,
url: eUrl
});
}
}
if (method == "Network.loadingFinished" && gObjects.length > 0) {
// Pop out the request object from both object queue and request queue
var requestId = params.requestId;
var object = null;
for (var o in gObjects) {
if (requestId == gObjects[o].requestId) {
object = gObjects.splice(o, 1)[0];
break;
}
}
// Usually loadingFinished will be immediately after responseReceived
if (object == null) {
console.log('Failed!!');
return;
}
gRequests.splice(gRequests.indexOf(object.url), 1);
chrome.debugger.sendCommand(
source,
"Network.getResponseBody",
{"requestId": requestId},
function (response) {
if (response) {
dispatch(source.tabId, object.target, JSON.parse(response.body));
} else {
console.log("Empty response for " + object.url);
}
// If we don't have any request waiting for response, re-attach debugger
// since without this step it will lead to memory leak.
if (gRequests.length == 0) {
chrome.debugger.detach({
tabId: source.tabId
}, function () {
chrome.debugger.attach({
tabId: source.tabId
}, "1.0", function () {
chrome.debugger.sendCommand({
tabId: source.tabId
}, "Network.enable");
});
});
}
});
}
}
);
var initialListener = function (details) {
if (gAttached) return; // Only need once at the very first request, so block all following requests
var tabId = details.tabId;
if (tabId > 0) {
gAttached = true;
chrome.debugger.attach({
tabId: tabId
}, "1.0", function () {
chrome.debugger.sendCommand({
tabId: tabId
}, "Network.enable");
});
// Remove self since the debugger is attached already
chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest.removeListener(initialListener);
}
};
// Attach debugger on startup
chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest.addListener(initialListener, {urls: ["<all_urls>"]}, ["blocking"]);
// Filter if the url is what we want
function getTarget(url) {
for (var i in TARGETS) {
var target = TARGETS[i];
if (url.match(target.url)) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
const TARGETS = [
{url: '/path1', desc: 'target1'},
{url: '/path2', desc: 'target2'}
]
Romulus Urakagi Ts'ai
2017-12-26
根据我的经验,请求可能尚未完成。您可以在 getResponseBody 之前尝试
import time;time.sleep(5)
。
shouldsee
2023-10-07
我遇到了类似的问题。我认为 sendCommand 没有立即执行。我遇到的问题是在“Network.enable”发送完成之前发送的请求。尝试添加完成
chrome.debugger.sendCommand({
tabId: gCurrentTab.id
}, "Network.enable")
Sangam Shankar
2018-02-15